NMAA has recently been cited as calling for higher highway speeds in Fairfax media and
numerous radio stations mainly in Australia. We believe that a sensible
debate is needed regarding higher speed limits on certain roads to
improve safety by reducing fatigue and other factors.
Ironically
the thing that sparked this issue is the recent call by the RTA to
reduce the speed limit on the Newell Highway from 110 to 100 km/h which
made even the very conservative NRMA uncomfortable. |
|
Read more...
|
|
BMW ad axed by Nanny-State |
BMW's latest ad for the Z4 has been axed in Australia because two brain-washed ninnies complained. (or was that other competitor car companies?) Either way, it is a travesty that such complaints are even entertained by our authorities, who it appears have also been brain-washed by years of hysterical speed kills propaganda.
According to the Australian, The watchdog banned the ad on the basis it depicted illegal driving.
"The board noted that the advertisement does depict in a number of places the driver intentionally allowing the wheels of the car to lose traction and perform ... a four-wheel drift," the bureau's judgment said.
BMW hit back, saying it was art, not hooning. "We believe the audience can distinguish between fantasy and reality," a statement from BMW to the board said.
Millions of Australian TV viewers have already seen the ad which has now been declared illegal and banned, presumably because the artistic use of wheelies to apply the paint might be seen as something you could do on the road. Are we all so mindless that we need that level of protection from the Advertising Standards Bureau?
Read more about it at mister-cars
See the BMW expression of joy website
Search the ASB Complaints database for BMW to see just how the system fails us. (example)
|
|
New braking advert from SA misses mark |
 The South Australian Motor Accident Commission (MAC) has recently released a new road safety commercial aimed a slowing drivers down. The ad contrives to show a slow-motion reconstuction, first at an initial speed of 65km/h and then at 60km/h. Not surprisingly, the 65km/h crash ends in death while the 60km/h crash ends with little more than a bruise.
Sadly, like all of these ads, it fails to recognise that initial travelling speed is just one factor of many that could affect the outcome of the crash. (driver attention, driver skill, tyres, brakes, pedestrian caution, to name a few)
We make the following observations about the ad:
- at the
moment the driver sees her, she's a metre or more before the road, clearly doesn't
look left or right, hears the screeching, but blithely keeps walking.
- the
road is clear in all directions, swerving, either with or without braking
would easily have avoided the crash.
- The scenario relies upon a 1.5 second driver reaction time (a bit slow) Using the same theoretical calculations, we note that a 65km/h driver with a 1 second reaction time would stop 4 metres before the 60km/h driver - perhaps the message should be pay attention instead of slow down.
We are concerned that this type of advertising imprints drivers with the idea that panic braking without any steering is the best/only way to react to such a situation, and that speed is the only relevant factor.
We encourage you to test your own reaction time (most people easily beat 0.75s) and see if you still think the 5km/h is the most important factor.
|
Welcome...
The National Motorists Association Australia (NMAA) is an
organisation dedicated to standing up for Australian motorists. We have
been active for many years and are not funded by government or
insurance companies. We represent motorists against an increasing
number of unfair policies and advocate for sound, logical, effective road safety strategies.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
RACQ seeks update on withdrawn radars |
|
The RACQ is seeking talks with Queensland police over the withdrawal of 180 digital mobile radars. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Independent research not worth the paper it's printed on |
Time and again we are presented with so-called credible research, from
this or that university with an impressive sounding name. Next time you
see this 'research' look a bit deeper.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Broncos get GovCo sponsorship anyway |
The controversy over the $1M sponsorship of the Brisbane Broncos by the
floundering Queensland Health Department has been solved by simply
moving the sponsorship deal to another department.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
National Motorists Association Australia 
